<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Net Neutrality on System Overlord</title><link>https://systemoverlord.com/tags/net-neutrality.html</link><description>Recent content in Net Neutrality on System Overlord</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><managingEditor>david@systemoverlord.com (David Tomaschik)</managingEditor><webMaster>david@systemoverlord.com (David Tomaschik)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://systemoverlord.com/tags/net-neutrality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Major Sites that a 'tiered' Internet Would Have Killed</title><link>https://systemoverlord.com/2011/01/24/major-sites-that-a-tiered-internet-would-have-killed/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:08:02 +0000</pubDate><author>david@systemoverlord.com (David Tomaschik)</author><guid>https://systemoverlord.com/2011/01/24/major-sites-that-a-tiered-internet-would-have-killed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Again and again, we hear about the idea of a "tiered" Internet, containing 1st and 2nd class citizens.  In some variants, entire sites would be cut off by ISPs.  Let's take a look at sites that probably would not have been able to get started with the notion of a "tiered" Internet.  In this list, I'm including major sites that were started without major commercial backing, whose success only came after making it big -- something that takes users being able to access the site, of course.  Let's assume that a tiered Internet came out about a decade ago, right after the fall of the dot-com era.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>